Google Maps and its Street View feature have transformed the way we navigate and explore our world. This powerful tool offers incredible convenience, but it also raises significant privacy concerns.
Have you ever noticed that some houses appear blurred on Google Maps? This isn’t a glitch. Individuals and businesses can request to have their properties blurred for safety and privacy reasons. Let’s explore why and how this works.
Table of Contents
The primary reason houses are blurred on Google Maps is to protect individual privacy. Launched in 2007, Google Street View provides panoramic views of streets worldwide, captured by cameras mounted on Google’s vehicles.
Those images, however, can reveal detailed information about a property, such as house numbers, floor plans, and even personal activities. Privacy advocates have raised concerns about the detailed imagery of private properties and individuals, leading to numerous requests to blur specific images.
Privacy concerns are closely tied to safety and security issues. Individuals escaping dangerous situations or those with valuable possessions might choose to blur their homes to deter potential criminals or stalkers.
In addition, some people have found themselves in compromising situations on Street View. For example, in San Francisco, a man was photographed entering an adult bookstore, and women were captured sunbathing topless in a park at Stanford–all accidental situations that serve as a great reminder of the importance of privacy in our everyday lives.
Blurring your house on Google Maps is a straightforward process. You can visit the Google Maps website, locate your home, and use the “Report a Problem” tool to specify the areas you want blurred. You’ll of course need to provide a reason for your request, but once Google reviews and approves your request, the blurring will be applied. You can even specify which parts you want blurred, such as your house, car, or other parts.
These requests often stem from privacy concerns, especially from individuals who have experienced harassment or stalking. Privacy advocates have also expressed concerns about the detailed imagery available on Street View in general, as it can unwillingly expose sensitive information about a person’s residence, like the layout of a home (including the number of doors and windows, and the location of security cameras), the types of vehicles on the property (including boats, motorcycles, trailers, etc), how many and what breed of pets live in a home, and even any signs of vulnerability like overgrown bushes or trees that might be easy to climb.
For better or worse, once Google approves a blurring request, it becomes a permanent change.
This policy can be frustrating for new homeowners or neighbors who didn’t request the blurring. For example, a Reddit user mentioned that they requested their house be blurred 16 years ago, and the entire street remains blurred to this day.
So keep in mind that a blurring request can affect not only the individual property you are requesting, but sometimes neighboring properties as well.
The blurring of houses on Google Maps highlights a larger issue regarding geospatial data privacy.
With the growing use of satellite imagery in mapping services, there are concerns about surveillance and the potential for gathering personal information, leading to some regions imposing limits on how detailed satellite images can be.
On the other hand, satellite imagery has been a game changer for human rights groups to document abuses, especially in inaccessible areas. Even then, while this technology offers valuable evidence, private companies collect this data and could end up being influenced by governments or other entities, compromising the reliability of the images.
Any way you look at the pros and cons of this technology, it creates a complex legal and ethical landscape for privacy and image usage.
Google has faced various legal challenges and regulations concerning its use of images. The Pentagon was probably one of the first government agencies to make it clear that no images of military bases could be made public on the platform.
Regulatory actions have also had a significant impact on the availability of Street View in different countries. While Germany went as far as banning Street View altogether, Switzerland’s Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner sued Google, arguing that the faces and vehicle number plates were not adequately anonymized.
Much closer to home, in Pittsburgh, a couple named Aaron and Christine Boring sued Google for invasion of privacy after a photo of their home appeared online. Although they initially lost, a later ruling declared Google an intentional trespasser, resulting in a symbolic $1 fine.
Moreover, in 2010, Google admitted that its Street View vehicles had covertly collected data from unencrypted Wi-Fi networks, resulting in a $13 million settlement to resolve a class-action lawsuit.
Street View has caught people in embarrassing or compromising situations–like men exiting strip clubs or women in their underwear–and sensitive locations have been exposed.
For instance, in 2007, a Street View vehicle captured an image of a house on fire in Gibson, Arkansas. The residents later requested the removal of the image, emphasizing the sensitivity of such situations.
Entire communities have voiced objections to being featured on Street View. For example, the community of North Oaks, MN, successfully removed all Street View images of its property from the platform, claiming that all roads and residences are indeed private property and that the Street View car didn’t have any rights to enter the area, much less take any pictures.
Alphabet, Google’s parent company, has of course acknowledged privacy concerns over Street View and Satellite images, and has already implemented measures to address them.
As you might have noticed, the company automatically blurs faces and license plates in Street View images to protect individuals’ anonymity. And of course, if you feel like those details are not enough, you can always request for any images of your property to be blurred altogether.
While privacy is crucial, it’s also essential to consider security. Detailed home images online could potentially be used by criminals to identify weak points and plan burglaries.
After all, according to security expert Anna Redmond, the detailed visual data of a home and its surroundings can reveal vulnerabilities. From property layout and security measures to routine habits, this information can be exploited by those with malicious intent. This is especially concerning for individuals facing specific threats or those with a high public profile.
Additionally, to protect your home, you should consider installing adequate lighting, using strong locks, and investing in a security system. Remember, these are just a few steps, and a comprehensive security plan is crucial for safeguarding your property.
The blurring of houses on Google Maps reflects a growing concern about our digital footprints. In today’s tech-savvy world, it’s easy to forget that the convenience of online maps comes with a trade-off: privacy. Whether you’re worried about personal safety, protecting your property, or safeguarding sensitive business information, controlling how your home appears online is essential.
Brad Crisp is the CEO at Maptive.com, based in Denver, CO and born in San Francisco, CA. He has extensive experience in Business Mapping, GIS, Data Visualization, Mapping Data Analytics and all forms of software development. His career includes Software Development and Venture Capital dating back to 1998 at businesses like Maptive, GlobalMojo (now Giving Assistant), KPG Ventures, Loopnet, NextCard, and Banking.
Call Us: 
